Flycatchers copy conspecifics in nest-site selection but neither personal experience nor frequency of tutors have an effect 
Jaakkonen T., Kari A. & Forsman J.T.
- PLoS ONE
| Reviews 4 | PEQ* 3.7 | PAQ** 3.3 | Published |
Seeking a sex-specific Coolidge effect in a simultaneous hermaphrodite
Anthes N., Werminghausen J. & Lange R.
- Ethology
| Reviews 1 | PEQ* - | PAQ** 3.7 | Early view |
Predation risk affects the levels of maternal immune factors in avian eggs
Morosinotto C., Ruuskanen S., Thomson R.L., Siitari H., Korpimäki E. & Laaksonen T.
- Journal of Avian Biology
| Reviews 4 | PEQ* 3.6 | PAQ** 3.7 | In press |
Conceptual frameworks and methods for advancing invasion ecology
Heger T., Liebaug A.T., Botta-Dukát Z., Gherardi F., Hoppe C., Hoste I., Jax K., Lindström L., Boets P., Haider S., Hoppe C., Kollmann J., Wittmann M. & Jeschke J.M.
- AMBIO
| Reviews 2 | PEQ* 4.3 | PAQ** 4.2 | Early view |
Online solutions and the ‘Wallacean shortfall’: What does GBIF contribute to our knowledge of species’ ranges?
Beck J., Ballesteros-Mejia L., Nagel P. & Kitching I.J.
- Diversity and Distributions
| Reviews 2 | PEQ* 3.5 | PAQ** 4.2 | Early view |
Maladaptive habitat use of a North American woodpecker in population decline
Frei B., Fyles J. & Nocera, J.J.
- Ethology
| Reviews 4 | PEQ* 3.0 | PAQ** 3.8 | Published |
Non-visual mate choice ability in a cavefish (Poecilia mexicana) is not mechanosensory
Rüschenbaum S. & Schlupp I.
- Ethology
| Reviews 3 | PEQ* 3.7 | PAQ** 2.7 | Published |
Retention forestry and biodiversity conservation: a parallel with agroforestry
Roberge J-M., Mönkkönen M., Toivanen T. & Kotiaho J.S.
- Nature Conservation
| Reviews 6 | PEQ* 3.7 | PAQ** 3.7 | Published |
Temporal peaks in social information: prospectors visit conspecific nests after a simulated predator visit
Thomson R.L., Sirkiä P.M., Villers A. & Laaksonen, T.
- Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
| Reviews 1 | PEQ* - | PAQ** 3.7 | Published |
Herbivory at marginal populations: consequences for maternal fitness and vegetative differentiation
Castilla A. R., Alonso C. & Herrera C.M.
- Acta Oecologica
| Reviews 3 | PEQ* 3.7 | PAQ** 3.7 | Published |
Trace elements in claw keratin as temporally explicit indicators of geographic origin in terrestrial mammals
Ethier D.M., Kyle C.J., Kyser T.K. & Nocera J.J.
- Annales Zoologici Fennici
| Reviews 3 | PEQ* 3.4 | PAQ** 3.0 | Published |
Diverse reproductive barriers in hybridising crickets suggests extensive variation in the evolution and maintenance of isolation
Veen T., Faulks J., Tyler F., Lloyd J. & Tregenza T.
- Evolutionary Ecology
| Reviews 4 | PEQ* 3.5 | PAQ** 3.9 | Published |
Morph-specific and sex-specific temperature effects on morphology in the colour polymorphic damselfly Ischnura elegans
Abbott J.K.
- Animal Biology
| Reviews 4 | PEQ* 3.8 | PAQ** 3.4 | Published |
Mammalian nest predator feces as a cue in avian habitat selection decisions
Forsman J.T., Mönkkönen M., Korpimäki E. & Thomson R.L.
- Behavioral Ecology
| Reviews 4 | PEQ* 3.3 | PAQ** 3.8 | Published |
The benefits of interpopulation hybridization diminish with increasing divergence of small populations
Pekkala N., Knott K.E., Kotiaho J.S., Nissinen K. & Puurtinen M.
- Journal of Evolutionary Biology
| Reviews 4 | PEQ* 3.3 | PAQ** 4.0 | Published |
High maternal species density mediates unidirectional heterospecific matings in Calopteryx damselflies
Keränen I., Kahilainen A., Knott K.E., Kotiaho J.S. & Kuitunen K.
- Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
| Reviews 2 | PEQ* 3.7 | PAQ** 4.0 | Published |
List indicates the work has been initially submitted, reviewed and revised in Peerage of Science. Further revisions and peer review organized by journal may have altered the article after Peerage of Science peer review.
*Peerage Essay Quality (PEQ) of an article is the average of the PEQ-scores of the peer reviews it received, and indicates the quality of the peer review process. Scale: 1.0 [poor] - 5.0 [excellent]
**Peerage Article Quality (PAQ) is the PEQ-weighted average of the scores peer reviewers gave for the manuscript in final evaluation, and indicates the quality of the article itself. Scale: 1.0 [poor] - 5.0 [excellent]
LOG IN
